Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Angry White Men and the Yellow Rose of Texas

This is the first time I have posted something I haven't written, but this deserves broader attention from those concerned about academic truth.

"Black author riles some Texas historians with new book about Yellow Rose of Texas Legend
by Martha Rodriguez/ The Auris Project, Inc. Thursday, Mar 2 2006, 2:18pm
books@aurisproject.org address: PO Box 201731, San Antonio, Texas 78220 phone: (866)274-8814

A book, a forum, and a question of identity.

Texas journalist and activist Denise McVea says her white male detractors are why people do not read history anymore. The genre has been hijacked.

SAN ANTONIO, Texas. A book about the true identity of the woman who inspired the Yellow Rose of Texas legend is causing a cantankerous stir inside Texas history communities-even before the book has been released to the general public.

According to legend, a fair-skinned black woman, Emily West, helped Texas win its independence from Mexico when she distracted Mexican general Antonio Lopez Santa on the San Jacinto battlefield during the Texas Revolution in April of 1836.

For decades, history buffs have described Emily West as a servant or slave and her method of distraction as a seduction. In some cases, she has been described as a prostitute.

Making Myth of Emily: Emily West de Zavala and the Yellow Rose of Texas Legend, presents research that shows Emily West de Zavala, the biracial wife of the vice president of Texas in 1836, was the inspiration for the Yellow Rose of Texas legend, but refutes that the woman sexually distracted Santa Anna. The first such book of its kind regarding the legend, the book states that the legend arose because of efforts to hide Emily West de Zavala's racial identity.

Many Texas historians and history buffs, once described by former Texas Historical Commission Executive Director as a snickering white menace, responded to McVea's research with outrage. For several weeks some men have posted increasingly hysterical messages to a popular Alamo history site, trying to convince people not to read the book.

But, the strategy may be backfiring. According to McVea, sales of the book have exploded since the men began posting to the website.

McVea, who is the executive director of the Auris Project, Inc., which is publishing the book, says that even she was surprised at the hostile response to her research, which she conducted for more than 10 years.

"When I started this project several years ago," she said, "I quickly learned that there were white male historians in Texas who simply were not open to hearing from a black woman about their precious legend. But I never expected them to expose their bias so publicly and with so much hatred. This is not everybody, mind you, but just a few people used to having their own way."

She also speculated that many of the attacks against her on the forum probably have something to do with the fact that the book exposes some questionable behavior by a few prominent historians regarding the authenticity of documents presented to the public, and other potential scandals.

"Suffice it to say that there are a few history communities or institutions that might stand to be embarrassed by some of the research in the book," McVea said. "I guess if I were them, Id be hysterical, too."

To visit the Yellow Rose of Texas thread at the Alamo Site forum, go to http://www.thealamofilm.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=2

To learn more about Making Myth of Emily, go to:

Questions?Contact Martha Rodriguez at:


Michael Phillips has authored the following:

White Metropolis: Race, Ethnicity and Religion in Dallas, Texas, 1841-2001 (Austin:  University of Texas Press, 2006)

(with Patrick L. Cox) The House Will Come to Order: How the Texas Speaker Became a Power in State and National Politics. (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010)

“Why Is Big Tex Still a White Cowboy? Race, Gender, and the ‘Other Texans’” in Walter Buenger and Arnoldo de León, eds., Beyond Texas Through Time: Breaking Away From Past Interpretations (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2011)

“The Current is Stronger’: Images of Racial Oppression and Resistance in North Texas Black Art During the 1920s and 1930s ”  in Bruce A. Glasrud and Cary D. Wintz, eds., The Harlem Renaissance in the West: The New Negroes’ Western Experience (New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2011)

“Dallas, 1989-2011,” in Richardson Dilworth, ed. Cities in American Political History (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011)

(With John Anthony Moretta, Keith J. Volonto, Austin Allen, Doug Cantrell and Norwood Andrews), Keith J. Volonto and Michael Phillips. eds., The American Challenge: A New History of the United States, Volume I.   (Wheaton, Il.: Abigail Press, 2012).

(With John Anthony Moretta and Keith J. Volanto), Keith J. Volonto and Michael Phillips, eds., The American Challenge: A New History of the United States, Volume II. (Wheaton, Il.: Abigail Press, 2012).

(With John Anthony Moretta and Carl J. Luna), Imperial Presidents: The Rise of Executive Power from Roosevelt to Obama  (Wheaton, Il.: Abigail Press, 2013). 

“Texan by Color: The Racialization of the Lone Star State,” in David Cullen and Kyle Wilkison, eds., The Radical Origins of the Texas Right (College Station: University of Texas Press, 2013).

He is currently collaborating, with longtime journalist Betsy Friauf, on a history of African American culture, politics and black intellectuals in the Lone Star State called God Carved in Night: Black Intellectuals in Texas and the World They Made.


Anonymous said...

The only angry or hysterical person in relation to Denise McVea's book is Ms. McVea herself. Because Ms. McVea's book was rejected by main stream publishers for faulty research, she was forced to self-publish it through her non-profit agency. She then promoted it by attacking any historian who was critical of her strange research methods. Oddly Ms. McVea provides no proof for her One-Emily-Theory within the book and omits photographs of Emily de Zavala, which would prove her wrong. Ms. McVea has also attempted to sue two authors that made the mistake of expressing their "opinions" of the book, but she failed miserably.

Anonymous said...

I've never even heard of this book or weird story about the de Zavala family and I'm pretty versed in Texas history. I don't remember seeing this book in any book stores or recall seeing any reviews of it. It couldn't have been too big a racial controversy if the media didn't jump all over it. It sounds like a lot of crying over spilled milk to me because nobody bought it. ~ Echo

DeFuera said...

These anonymous comments are really revealing. They are clearly coming from the angry white males Ms. McVea was talking about. Yuck. She is right: no one is interested in reading history from these saps.

Anonymous said...

I did read the book. It is riveting! I can see why these guys are trying to keep people from reading it. Whoa. It reads like a mystery novel and what I most appreciated was the writer's citations. Everything she says is documented. Not so for these losers who seem to be desperately hoping no one sees what I saw. Who are they, anyway?

Anonymous said...

I looked up the account name DeFuera...this is Denise McVeas' account! She is self promoting in a devious way.

I see why every person, including me, is staying anonymous. If you do share your opinion that Ms. McVea does not agree with she'll attempt to sue you! Just look up via the internet the case McVea v Crisp to shed some light on the subject.

Michael Emery said...

Well, I am now reading MAKING MYTH OF EMILY along with other eye-opening works that have something unorthodox to say about some black folks in American history. Methinks that there is much that does not meet the eye, as the expression goes. But my major point in this comment is that I would love to meet Ms. McVea in order to interview her and learn more.